Skip to Content
 Close search

Research

Through our research, the Commission contributes to the public debate and encourages informed policy discussion.

The Commission has a statutory mandate to conduct a program of research to support its inquiries, annual reporting and other responsibilities, including promoting community awareness and understanding of various productivity and regulatory issues.

National Association of Nursing Homes and Private Hospitals Inc. + (PDF - 269k)

Submission 25 for Nursing Home Subsidies View full list


place is documented ’n the Review of the Structure of Nursing Home Funding Arrangements, Stage 1 by Professor Bob Gregory and published in August 1993. ... Improved consumer acceptance. Continuous improvement. Resources to do the job. Enhanced capacity

Date received: 16 Sep 1998

Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) (PDF - 1075k)

Submission DR130 for Superannuation: Assessing Efficiency And Competitiveness View full list


licences. AIST supports regular, rigorous and independent reviews. of this process. ... Draft Recommendation 19:. Independent review of. insurance in super. Agree. AIST recommendations. •

Date received: 13 Jul 2018

AIA Australia (PDF - 180k)

Submission DR88 for Superannuation Competitiveness And Efficiency View full list


In addition, AIA Australia is ranked number 1 in new sales to independent financial advisors in the retail advice market5. ... AIA Australia also works with a network of affinity partners that distribute life insurance products.

Date received: 9 Sep 2016

Nicholas Barr and Peter Diamond (PDF - 356k)

Submission 74 for Superannuation: Assessing Efficiency And Competitiveness View full list


conflicted remuneration structures within the financial planning industry’ (Australia Industry Super Network, 2010, p. ... This appendix reviews some of analysis behind our recommendations and, in doing so, reinforces the findings of the Cooper Review

Date received: 13 Sep 2017

Women with Disabilities Australia (PDF - 239k)

Submission 16 for Review Of The National Disability Agreement View full list


3. This brief Submission to the Productivity Commission’s National Disability Agreement Review, does. ... For example, whilst ‘economic participation’and ‘independent living’are obviously critically important for people with disability, the

Date received: 24 Aug 2018

Back to submissions 1183-1226 (PDF - 932k)

Submission 1183-1226 for Mental Health View full list


a) The Intellectual Property and Competition Review Committee's ('IPCR Committee') 37 review of intellectual property under the CPA:. ... Since the adoption of the NCP, there have been reviews of patent legislation, 79.

Date received: 23 Jan 2020

CHOICE (PDF - 440k)

Submission DR113 for Superannuation Competitiveness And Efficiency View full list


research indicating that 50-80% of switching was simply due to a change of jobs or their. ... CHOICE | Superannuation competitiveness and efficiency 9. Unengaged consumers were attracted to independent and impartial advice on what to do about.

Date received: 23 Sep 2016

Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) (PDF - 845k)

Submission 39 for Superannuation: Assessing Efficiency And Competitiveness View full list


Page | 7. Introduction Timing of the review The superannuation industry is of strategic importance to Australia’s current and future well- being. ... and Wilson, B. (2010). Super System Review final report. Part One: Overview and Recommendations.

Date received: 21 Aug 2017

Back to submissions 1183-1226 (PDF - 1084k)

Submission 1183-1226 for Mental Health View full list


Review 2002.() 3, n30, pp 73-74(outstanding reviews). ... 93 The reasons for excluding this legislative scheme from the review arc uncertain.

Date received: 23 Jan 2020

The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) (PDF - 1430k)

Submission DR98 for Superannuation Competitiveness And Efficiency View full list


There have been 14 major reviews and inquiries into financial services since 2009. ... The Commission proposes to use information from ‘reviews by others’. Presumably this would be a survey-based review, given the large number of employers in the

Date received: 13 Sep 2016